Blog

Busting Top 6 .NET Myths

Busting Top 6 .NET Myths

In late 2000, Microsoft released the first beta version of the .Net Framework. Since its 1.0 release in 2002, MSFT has continued to devote a significant amount of time and money to developing and improving the Framework.

During its initial days, .net development companies were dismissed as a closed-source version of Java technology. A significant upgrade has been made every year for nearly 15 years since that 1.0 release, each with improved tools, increased functionality, and the addition of support for new platforms. Recent years have seen some of the most promising developments.

For example, Microsoft's acquisition of Xamarin and the announcement of .Net Core have shown that they are committed to the platform. However, despite all this, rumors and half-truths continue to circulate. Let's examine and eliminate the myths surrounding .Net.

It's A Relic Of The Past (Legacy Platform)

It's natural to assume .NET as an "old" platform, with Go and Rust as the new cool kids. However, we believe that this assessment of the platform is inaccurate. The Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR) was introduced to the .NET platform on October 1, 2010. It ushered in a period of rapid and continuous innovation concerning runtime, supported programming languages, and dynamic languages.

Since its inception, .NET has made extensive use of functional programming. Hence, we can hire .net developers to use object-oriented and functional techniques when creating new applications. Supported features include:

  • Discards

  • Pattern Matching

  • Deconstructing and Tuples

  • Expression-Bodied Members

Among its many features are lambda closures and generics (which Go is only now getting around to implementing), extension methods, and anonymous types.

C# has seen a rebound in recent years, according to the 2021 State of the Octoverse report from GitHub.

As most .NET's popular language, C#, continues to expand its capabilities. In the future, C# will inherit many of the dynamic and functional features from F# as Microsoft continues to invest in F# development.

.NET Is Not Open Source

When Steve Ballmer led Microsoft, there were many .NET myths. Microsoft's open-source strategy has changed dramatically since Satya Nadella took the reins. No, Microsoft's open-source system isn't flawless. The company still has a long way to go until it is no longer the closed ecosystem it was in its early days.

The .NET Foundation is in charge of governing .NET, the .NET compiler, and many other internals are publicly available on GitHub. It has been certified for Red Hat Enterprise Linux since 2015. The usual suspects dominate GitHub's language rankings, although C# is a solid ninth-place finisher.

Although there are fewer packages in the Nuget repository than in the NPM repository, users report that the most important ones are highly stable, well-written, safe, and well-documented. They have rarely sensed a shortage of open source options for the apps they have created.

Furthermore, Nuget has less "filler" than other distributions. NET's standard and base className libraries are far more extensive than before. It's a huge advantage to have comprehensive first-party libraries created and maintained by paid experts.

.NET Is A Windows-Based Framework

This misconception has persisted since the .NET Framework's infancy. To be sure, the .NET Framework was initially developed for Windows. It contained several references to Win32 APIs via P/Invoke, making it incompatible with other operating systems. This issue persisted even when Miguel de Icaza initiated the Mono project to port .NET to Linux.

Many of Mono's shortcomings and lingering Win32 API dependencies were only addressed in 2016 when Microsoft became serious about .NET Core. With .NET 5 and now .NET 6, the confusion of .NET Core vs. .NET Framework and .NET standard has been put to rest.

The most recent version of .NET, .NET 6, works on Windows, Linux, and macOS and is compatible with x86, x64, Arm32, and Arm64 processor architectures.

As a result, the latest M1 MacBooks can be used to develop .NET applications. And make use of the most recent AWS Arm-based EC2 instances. As part of Microsoft's official Docker image collection, there are builds for all major Linux distributions.

Lastly, you can use .NET in your CI/CD pipelines on Linux, using GitHub, GitLab, or other CI/CD platforms.

.Net Is Devoted To The Development Of Boomer businesses.

It's an excellent platform for enterprise development utilized in banks, banking, insurance, defense, enterprise content management, and cloud-scale backend.

As a platform supporting mission-critical workloads, you gain all of the advantages in terms of security and performance.

In addition to being the most flexible platform to work on, ASP.NET is also one of its kind. C# is one of the most approachable programming languages available. It can be used to create applications for various platforms, including desktops, mobile devices, web servers, and even 3D games.

In addition to Cuphead, Hearthstone, Rust, and Escape from Tarkov, many popular games are based using the Unity engine.

For cross-platform app development, the .NET Framework can be utilized with a variety of frameworks, such as:

  • Avalonia

  • The Uno Platform

  • Microsoft's own Multi-platform App UI

Because of the new .NET's six basic APIs, Microsoft brings.NET in line with other historically more accessible languages and runtimes, such as Go, Python, and Node.js.

As .NET and C# are such powerful programming languages, it makes perfect sense to professionally hire .net developers in India.

Expensive Tooling

As with many .NET myths, this one probably arose due to pricey early Visual Studio tools. Apart from the free, nearly feature-complete Community Edition of Visual Studio provided by Microsoft, there are now several more options to consider:

  • VS Code

  • Visual Studio for macOS

  • JetBrains Rider with paid and free licenses

Even Enterprise Visual Studio, which includes all of the standard version features, is competitively priced for the productivity it gives.

Not As Fast As Other Languages Like Python, Node, Go, Rust

Due to its strong performance and competitiveness with Rust and Go in web workloads, .NET 6 outperforms Node and Python frameworks many times.

It's possible that this urban legend began with ASP.NET 1.0. An ASP.NET development company employs an agile methodology to provide customized solutions within a constrained framework. Async/await, on the other hand, has always been available in the.NET framework. Still, it wasn't easy to utilize in the early days and thus rarely used by most developers. Blocking I/O becomes a significant issue even in multi-threaded environments without asynchronous programming.

Compared to Go, Python, and Node, there are circumstances where.NET is not the best choice. In particular, the nature of just-in-time compilation to machine code makes it unsuitable for "cold starts" in applications like CLI tools or serverless functions that require a near-instant response for a single request. This is especially true, and many of Microsoft's own CLI apps are written in Python for this precise reason!

However, users can rest assured that .NET will continue to improve performance as new features and enhancements are released.

About The Author

mds

Pooja Makkar
Digital Marketing Specialist

MetaDesign Solutions

Digital Marketing Specialist at MetaDesign Solutions (MDS). She is working in this domain with various industry verticles. She also does content writing. Her articles focus on balancing information with SEO needs.

Get a Quote

Contact Us for your project estimation

We keep all information confidential and automatically agree to NDA.